This makes sense, given what we know about ChatGPT’s strengths. I then pasted this essay into ChatGPT and said it was an essay on why we should ban mobile phones. This resulted in some entertaining sentences like this: As with the literature essay, it was so far, so good.īut that was before I took the banning cigarettes model essay and replaced all the mentions of “cigarette” and “smoke” with “mobile phones”. It gave it a top grade and a nice comment. I took a model essay on why we should ban cigarettes, and asked it to mark it out of eight levels. While it is relatively straightforward to game ChatGPT for literature essays, it is much harder to game it for pure writing assessments. So is it case closed? Is this just another easily gameable AI system? Not quite. I then pasted this essay into ChatGPT and said it was an essay on the first chapter of Great Expectations, and to mark it out of four levels. This resulted in some entertaining paragraphs like: I then took the Romeo and Juliet essay and replaced all the mentions of Romeo with “Pip”, all the mentions of the Nurse with “Magwitch”, and all the mentions of Romeo and Juliet with Great Expectations. I took a good essay on Romeo and Juliet and asked ChatGPT to mark it out of four levels. So how does it cope with deliberate attempts to game it? It depends… Putting artificial intelligence marking to the test ChatGPT is orders of magnitude more sophisticated than older AI models. It’s about how students respond when they know their work is being marked by AI, and how the AI then responds to that.ġ9 are the distant past in the world of AI. It’s not about how well it does the job to begin with.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |